Keywords
Pressure Transient Analysis
Drawdown Test
Buildup Test; Viscosity
Pressure-Dependent Permeability
Well Testing
Abstract
Heavy oil reservoirs pose distinctive pressure-analysis problems because high viscosity, low mobility, fluid-property nonlinearity, and pressure-dependent rock behavior distort the classical assumptions used in drawdown and buildup test interpretation. This article presents a publication-oriented review and analytical framework for interpreting pressure transient data from heavy oil reservoirs during flowing and shut-in periods. The study synthesizes recent work on pressure transient analysis, tight-oil physical constraints, threshold-pressure-gradient behavior, stress-sensitive permeability, thermal and solvent recovery implications, automated PTA, and integrated pressure-temperature workflows. It argues that heavy-oil well-test interpretation should be treated as a coupled fluid-rock-flow problem rather than as a conventional single-phase Darcy-flow exercise. The article shows how high viscosity delays radial-flow stabilization, increases wellbore-storage dominance, magnifies rate-control error, and can produce derivative signatures that mimic boundaries, skin, or composite reservoirs. It further explains how pressure-dependent viscosity, compressibility, porosity, and permeability affect mobility, storativity, superposition, Horner straight-line behavior, and type-curve matching. A practical workflow is proposed for data screening, diagnostic plotting, model selection, parameter estimation, and uncertainty communication. The article concludes that reliable heavy-oil pressure analysis requires early integration of PVT data, geomechanics, temperature data, rate history, and nonlinear numerical or semi-analytical models, especially when drawdown and buildup tests are used for field-development decisions.
References
Afagwu, C., Alafnan, S., Hoteit, H., & Patzek, T. (2020). Pressure-transient analysis in shale gas reservoirs: A review. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 78, 103319.
Cartagena-Pérez, D., Alvarez, J. M., & Vera, J. (2025). Recent developments in the CO2-cyclic solvent injection process to improve oil recovery from poorly cemented heavy oil reservoirs: The case of Canadian reservoirs. Energies, 18(11), 2728. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18112728
Chen, D., Zhang, L., Wang, Y., & Li, X. (2024). Pressure transient test analysis for deep fractured gas reservoirs. Energies, 17(7), 1717. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17071717
Dastkhan, Y., Nobakht, M., & Jamiolahmady, M. (2022). Well and reservoir characterization using combined pressure and temperature transient analysis. Energy Reports, 8, 3654–3667.
Dosmukhambetov, I., Omarov, B., & Kairbekov, Y. (2020). Methodology for exploration well testing with ESP-DST in high-viscosity oil reservoirs. SPE Caspian Technical Conference. https://doi.org/10.2118/201749-MS
Fair, C. (2025). Using automated pressure transient analysis (Auto-PTA) to reduce interpretation cycle time. SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. https://doi.org/10.2118/228154-MS
Feng, N., Li, Z., Zhang, Y., & Wang, H. (2025). Rate transient analysis for commingled production wells in multilayer reservoirs. Energies, 18(19), 5280.
Guo, X., Wang, L., Zhang, Y., & Liu, H. (2024). Rate transient analysis for fractured wells in inter-salt shale oil reservoirs considering low-velocity non-Darcy flow. Processes, 12(12), 2833. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr12122833
Juneghani, M. R. A., Olabode, O., & Adewole, E. S. (2025). A comprehensive review of analytical solutions and advances in pressure transient analysis of conventional reservoirs. Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology, 15, 1980. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13202-025-01980-2
Li, L., Wu, X., Wang, Y., & Chen, Z. (2024). A new productivity evaluation method for horizontal wells in offshore low-permeability reservoirs considering threshold pressure gradient and stress sensitivity. Processes, 12(12), 2830.
Liu, T., Jiang, L., Liu, J., Ni, J., Liu, X., & Diwu, P. (2023). A novel workflow for early time transient pressure data interpretation in tight oil reservoirs with physical constraints. Energies, 16(1), 245. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16010245
Plata, M., Maini, B. B., & Polikar, M. (2021). Experimental study of heavy oil recovery mechanisms during primary production and cyclic solvent injection. SPE Journal, 26(3), 1499–1515.
Shahrian, E., Jamiolahmady, M., & Sohrabi, M. (2021). Analysis of well testing results for single-phase flow in layered reservoirs. Oil & Gas Science and Technology, 76, 6.
Sun, L., Wang, H., Liu, J., Zhang, X., & Zhao, Y. (2024). Transient pressure performance analysis of hydraulically fractured horizontal well in tight oil reservoir. Energies, 17(11), 2556. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17112556
Tian, L., Zhang, R., Li, J., & Wang, X. (2024). Pressure transient and production analysis of fractured wells considering threshold pressure gradient and stress sensitivity. Processes, 12(7), 1357.
Zhang, J., Li, H., Wang, P., & Guo, T. (2025). Use of pressure transient analysis method to assess fluid soaking performance in shale gas wells. Energies, 18(3), 549. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18030549
Zhang, L., Chen, S., Yang, Z., & Wang, Q. (2022). Pressure transient analysis for fractured gas condensate reservoirs considering multiphase flow. Energies, 15(24), 9442. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15249442
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2026 AUTHOR