Keywords
Sub-Saharan Africa
Political Governance
Legal Institutions
Elite Capture.
Article Number
13Abstract
Corruption prosecution in Africa continues to face difficulties even though many more laws and institutions are being put in place. Although the majority of nations in Sub-Saharan Africa have enacted legislation against corruption and formed organizations aimed at tackling corruption, there have been very few prosecutions in cases of high level corruption. It therefore becomes necessary to consider the reasons why corruption prosecution remains difficult and what could make the process more effective. In this paper, I will look at some of the underlying issues behind ineffective corruption prosecution. Using a qualitative analytical approach involving the review of key sources and comparative case analysis, I will assess the issues and factors involved in corruption prosecution in Africa, paying particular attention to corruption prosecution involving politically exposed persons. It emerges from the analysis that the biggest problem in corruption prosecution is not the lack of laws or organizations aimed at tackling the problem but the political and institutional environment within which corruption prosecution takes place. Political and institutional challenges like interference in judicial processes and fragmentation affect the effectiveness of corruption prosecution. Other factors that contribute to this include complex and lengthy procedures associated with the corruption process as well as evidence gathering problems. The analysis reveals that corruption prosecutions are not only limited but also selective in nature. There is also keen look into suggestions a robust conceptual model framework to make sense of these dynamics. Reform strategies including transparency measures, forensic auditing, and information systems provide a possible way of improving the situation. However, their effectiveness largely depends first and foremost on political good will and secondly on whether there is alignment among different organizations involved in the process. Future research needs to develop an integrated framework to analyze the issue of corruption prosecution in Africa.References
Ackerman, S. R. (1999). Corruption and government: Causes, consequences, and reform. Cambridge University Press.
Collier, P. (2000). Economic causes of civil conflict and their implications for policy. World Bank.
Daud, A. (2024). Anti-corruption institutions and governance reforms in Africa. African Governance Review, 12(2), 45–67.
Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC). (2014). Money laundering: Ibori has case to answer—Appeal Court. https://www.efccnigeria.org
Ethics and Anti-Corruption Commission (EACC). (2016). Report on investigations into the Eurobond proceeds. Nairobi: EACC.
Klitgaard, R. (1988). Controlling corruption. University of California Press.
Mammoh, F. (2015). Corruption and governance in Africa. In Z. Momoh (Ed.), Proceedings of the International Academic Conference for Sub-Sahara African Transformation & Development
Masibo, M. (2021). Political accountability and corruption control in Africa. Journal of African Policy Studies, 8(1), 67–89.
Mbaku, J. M. (1998). Corruption and the crisis of institutional reforms in Africa. Edwin Mellen Press.
Mills, L. C. (2017). Catching the ‘big fish’: The (ab)use of corruption-related prosecutions across sub-Saharan Africa. Development Policy Review, 35(S2), O160–O177
Momoh, A. (2015). Regionalization and development in Africa. Pambazuka Press.
Mutonyi, J. (2002). Fighting corruption: Is Kenya on the right track? Police Practice and Research, 3(1), 21–39.
National Assembly. (2019). Report of the Public Debt and Privatization Committee on the Eurobond. Nairobi: Government Printer.
National Treasury. (2014). Prospectus for the Republic of Kenya Sovereign Bond Issue. Nairobi: Government of Kenya.
Odhiambo, T. J., & Odek, A. W. (2022). Structural and institutional challenges of prosecuting high-profile persons in corruption-related cases in Kenya. IGI Global.
Office of the Auditor-General. (2015). Report of the Auditor-General on the Financial Statements of the National Government. Nairobi: Government of Kenya.
Ogwang, L. V. O. (2007). Rethinking Kenya’s anti-corruption strategies: Lessons from Botswana (Master’s thesis, University of Pretoria)
Popova, M., & Post, V. (2018). Prosecuting high-level corruption in Eastern Europe and beyond. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 14, 331–349.
Public Accounts Committee. (2016). Report on the Examination of the Auditor-General’s Findings on Eurobond Proceeds. Nairobi: National Assembly.
Rose-Ackerman, S. (1996). Corruption and democracy. Proceedings of the American Society of International Law, 90, 83–90.
Abed, G. T., & Gupta, S. (Eds.). (2002). Governance, corruption, and economic performance. International Monetary Fund.
Taylor, S. D. (2006). Divergent politico-legal responses to past presidential corruption in Zambia and Kenya. African Affairs, 105(418), 281–301.
U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ). (2009). KBR and Halliburton resolve foreign bribery charges. https://www.justice.gov
United Nations. (2003). United Nations Convention Against Corruption (UNCAC). United Nations.
Villar, P., & Papyrakis, E. (2017). Evaluating the impact of the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI) on corruption in Zambia
World Bank. (2015). Kenya Economic Update: Public Finance and Debt Dynamics. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Yeh, S. S. (2011). Corruption and the rule of law in Sub-Saharan Africa. African Journal of Legal Studies, 4(2), 187–208.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2026 William Ogada Owino, Yasin Khuso Gabon (Author)