ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE—DRIVEN LEADERSHIP MODELS AND ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE: EXAMINING LEADERSHIP CHALLENGES AND INSTITUTIONAL EFFECTIVENESS IN RELIGIOUS AND SECULAR INSTITUTIONS
PDF

Keywords

Artificial Intelligence
Leadership Models
Organizational Performance
Institutional Effectiveness
Religious Institutions
Secular Institutions

Abstract

In a variety of institutional contexts, artificial intelligence (AI) is quickly changing the character of organisational administration and leadership. New models of strategic planning, performance evaluation, and decision-making that integrate machine intelligence and human judgement have been established as a result of its growing incorporation into leadership systems. In an increasingly complicated digital environment, this change is altering how organisations function, adapt, and accomplish their goals. With a focus on leadership issues and institutional efficacy in both religious and secular institutions, this study investigates AI-driven leadership models and their impact on organisational performance. The study identifies the contextual constraints that impact acceptance and implementation while also examining how AI-supported leadership systems improve productivity, decision quality, and organisational responsiveness. AI-driven leadership can improve organisational outcomes by facilitating data-informed decisions, boosting operational efficiency, and fortifying strategic skills, according to findings from current scholarly discussions. However, the success of religious and secular institutions varies due to variances in leadership styles, ethical issues, institutional principles, and technical preparedness. Secular   institutions exhibit speedier adoption because of performance-driven structures, whereas religious institutions, in particular, tend to be more sensitive to ethical issues and human-centered leadership traditions. According to the study's findings, AI-driven leadership works best when it is integrated in a way that strikes a balance between technological capabilities, human oversight, ethical governance, and institutional context. In order to improve overall institutional performance, it also highlights the necessity of adaptable leadership models that take organisational values and technology innovation into account.

PDF

References

Avolio, B. J., Sosik, J. J., Kahai, S. S., & Baker, B. (2014). E-leadership: Re-examining transformations in leadership source and transmission. The Leadership Quarterly, 25 (1), 105—131.

Bass, B. M., & Riggio, R. E. (2006). Transformational leadership (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2017). The second machine age: Work, progress, and prosperity in a time of brilliant technologies. W. W. Norton & Company.

Bughin, J., Seong, J., Manyika, J., Chui, M., & Joshi, R. (2018). Notes from the AI frontier: Modeling the impact of AI on the world economy. McKinsey Global Institute.

Cameron, K. S. (1986). Effectiveness as paradox: Consensus and conflict in conceptions of organizational effectiveness. Management Science, 32(5), 539—553.

Campbell, H. A. (2020). Digital creatives and the rethinking of religious authority. Routledge.

Chatterjee, S., Rana, N. P., Dwivedi, Y. K., & Baabdullah, A. M. (2021). Understanding AI adoption in organizations: A technology—organization—environment perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 168, 120783.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage.

Davenport, T. H., & Ronanki, R. (2018). Artificial intelligence for the real world. Harvard Business Review, 96(1), 108—116.

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319—340.

Dwivedi, Y. K., Hughes, L., Ismagilova, E., Aarts, G., Coombs, C., Crick, T., Duan, Y., Dwivedi, R., Edwards, J., Eirug, A., Galanos, V., Ilavarasan, P. V., Janssen, M., Jones, P., Kar, A., Kizgin, H., Kronemann, B., Lal, B., Lucini, B., … Williams, M. D. (2021). Artificial intelligence (AI): Multidisciplinary perspectives on emerging challenges, opportunities, and agenda for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 57, 101994.

George, G., Lakhani, K. R., & Puranam, P. (2020). What has changed? The impact of artificial intelligence on the nature of work. Academy of Management Discoveries, 6(4), 544—549.

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Cengage.

Huang, M. H., & Rust, R. T. (2021). A strategic framework for artificial intelligence in marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 49 (1), 30—50.

Jarrahi, M. H. (2018). Artificial intelligence and the future of work: Human—AI symbiosis in organizational decision making. Business Horizons, 61(4), 577—586.

Kaplan, A., & Haenlein, M. (2019). Siri, Siri, in my hand: Whos the fairest in the land? On the interpretations, illustrations, and implications of artificial intelligence. Business Horizons, 62(1), 15—25.

Kellogg, K. C., Valentine, M. A., & Christin, A. (2020). Algorithms at work: The new contested terrain of control. Academy of Management Annals, 14(1), 366—410.

Makarius, E. E., Mukherjee, D., Fox, J. D., & Fox, A. K. (2020). Rising with the machines: A sociotechnical framework for bringing artificial intelligence into the organization. Journal of Business Research, 120, 262—273.

Northouse, P. G. (2022). Leadership: Theory and practice (9th ed.). Sage.

OECD. (2024). Artificial intelligence, digital transformation and organizational governance report. OECD Publishing.

Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2021). Nursing research: Generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice (11th ed.). Wolters Kluwer.

Raisch, S., & Krakowski, S. (2021). Artificial intelligence and management: The automation—augmentation paradox. Academy of Management Review, 46(1), 192—210.

Richard, P. J., Devinney, T. M., Yip, G. S., & Johnson, G. (2009). Measuring organizational performance: Towards methodological best practice. Journal of Management, 35 (3), 718—804.

Russell, S., & Norvig, P. (2021). Artificial intelligence: A modern approach (4th ed.). Pearson. ([Pearson][1])

Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2019). Research methods for business students (8th ed.). Pearson.

Shrestha, Y. R., Ben-Menahem, S. M., & von Krogh, G. (2019). Organizational decision-making structures in the age of artificial intelligence. California Management Review, 61 (4), 66—83.

Sousa, M. J., & Rocha, Á. (2019). Skills for disruptive digital business. Journal of Business Research, 94, 257—263.

Trist, E., & Emery, F. E. (1960). Sociotechnical systems. In C. W. Churchman & M. Verhulst (Eds.), Management sciences, models and techniques (Vol. 2). Pergamon Press.

Vial, G. (2019). Understanding digital transformation: A review and research agenda. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 28 (2), 118—144.

Wilson, H. J., & Daugherty, P. R. (2018). Collaborative intelligence: Humans and AI are joining forces. Harvard Business Review, 96 (4), 114—123.

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Sage.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2026 AUTHOR