Hobbes and Lockes’ Theories of State of Nature and Social Contract Through Pragmatic Lenses
Journal of Contemporary Academic Research and Methodologies
PDF

Keywords

State of nature
social contract
pragmatism
discourse analysis

Abstract

This study looks at some of the philosophical ideas of early thinkers, Thomas Hobbes and John Locke, and applies a pragmatist twist to them in order to wade into the possibilities of finding new paradigms and approaches to practice, since pragmatism is focused on practical results and solutions. The main objective of the study was to interrogate a pragmatic speculation into the theories of John Locke and Thomas Hobbes on the concepts of social contract and the nature of man. The research questions are to examine if a pragmatic lens is even applicable in the consideration of their views on the social contract and nature of man, to assess possible consequences of such an application on the practice of the social contract and the nature of man as envisioned by the two philosophers, and to recommend philosophical pathways that appear possible in such an intellectual journey into the unknown. The method used in this research is discourse analysis. The recommendation is that the field of philosophy has always been a field of questioning reality and seeking further knowledge, and such escapades need to be encouraged rather than thwarted.

PDF

References

Allyn, F. (2016). Philosophy and Political Engagement: Reflection in the public sphere. Palgrave Publishers

Anuja Barooah (2022). Social Contract Theory of John Locke and Thomas Hobbes IJRTI Volume 7, Issue 7, 2456-3315

Burnet, J. (1920). Early Greek Philosophy. 3rd Ed. A & C Black. London

Cottingham, J. (2008). Western Philosophy: An Anthology. Blackwell Publishing.

Edwards, A. (2002). "Hobbes" in Interpreting Modern Political Philosophy: From Machiavelli to Marx, eds. A. Edwards and J.

Elizabethe, K. (2019). Thomas Hobbes and John Locke’s State of Nature and Social Contract: A Comparative Analysis. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention

Glass, J. (1980). Hobbes and Narcissism: Pathology in the State of Nature. Political Theory, 8(3), 335-363. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/190918

Henderson, J. Y. (2000). The Context of the State of Nature. Fernwood Publishing. USA

Hobbes, T. (1950). Leviathan. Dutton

Jetmira, F. and Saimir, F. (2023). Interdisciplinary Journal of Research and Development Vol 10 No 2 / July 2023

John, M. V. S. (2021). The Social Contract Theories of Thomas Hobbes and John Locke: Comparative Analysis. PAU Excellencia Global Academy Foundation, Philippines

John, W. O. (2011). The Right of Revolution: An Analysis of John Locke and Thomas Hobbes’ Social Contract Theories. Boston College. USA

Laskar, Manzoor, Summary of Social Contract Theory by Hobbes, Locke and Rousseau (April 4, 2013). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2410525 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2410525

Locke, J., 1632-1704. (1948). The second treatise of civil government and A letter concerning toleration. Oxford: B. Blackwell

Locke, J., & Wootton, D. (2003). Locke: Political Writings. Hackett Publishing. DOI:10.1017/cbo9780511696879

Mohamed, E. & Mahmoud, A. (2024). Pragmatism as a research paradigm. Proceedings of the 21st Conference on Research Methodology for Business and Management Studies ECRM

Paul, G. & Aaron, B. W. (2018). Pragmatism and Idealism. European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/

Rakhimova, M. I. (2024). Philosophy and its role in society. American Journal of Interdisciplinary Research Vol. 25

Townshend (Palgrave Macmillan, Houndmills) A very helpful overview of key interpretative debates about Hobbes in the twentieth century.

William, D. N. (2018). Rediscovering pragmatism and the policy sciences. European Policy Analysis. Vol. 4. Issue 1. P.13-22

Yuniar, M. (2022). The Concept of the State of Nature on Human Morals from the Viewpoint of State Life. International Journal of Humanities Education and Social Sciences (IJHESS). Volume 1, No 5, pgs 572 - 579

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2026 Author