Abstract
This study looks at some of the philosophical ideas of early thinkers, Thomas Hobbes and John Locke, and applies a pragmatist twist to them in order to wade into the possibilities of finding new paradigms and approaches to practice, since pragmatism is focused on practical results and solutions. The main objective of the study was to interrogate a pragmatic speculation into the theories of John Locke and Thomas Hobbes on the concepts of social contract and the nature of man. The research questions are to examine if a pragmatic lens is even applicable in the consideration of their views on the social contract and nature of man, to assess possible consequences of such an application on the practice of the social contract and the nature of man as envisioned by the two philosophers, and to recommend philosophical pathways that appear possible in such an intellectual journey into the unknown. The method used in this research is discourse analysis. The recommendation is that the field of philosophy has always been a field of questioning reality and seeking further knowledge, and such escapades need to be encouraged rather than thwarted.
References
Allyn, F. (2016). Philosophy and Political Engagement: Reflection in the public sphere. Palgrave Publishers
Anuja Barooah (2022). Social Contract Theory of John Locke and Thomas Hobbes IJRTI Volume 7, Issue 7, 2456-3315
Burnet, J. (1920). Early Greek Philosophy. 3rd Ed. A & C Black. London
Cottingham, J. (2008). Western Philosophy: An Anthology. Blackwell Publishing.
Edwards, A. (2002). "Hobbes" in Interpreting Modern Political Philosophy: From Machiavelli to Marx, eds. A. Edwards and J.
Elizabethe, K. (2019). Thomas Hobbes and John Locke’s State of Nature and Social Contract: A Comparative Analysis. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention
Glass, J. (1980). Hobbes and Narcissism: Pathology in the State of Nature. Political Theory, 8(3), 335-363. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/190918
Henderson, J. Y. (2000). The Context of the State of Nature. Fernwood Publishing. USA
Hobbes, T. (1950). Leviathan. Dutton
Jetmira, F. and Saimir, F. (2023). Interdisciplinary Journal of Research and Development Vol 10 No 2 / July 2023
John, M. V. S. (2021). The Social Contract Theories of Thomas Hobbes and John Locke: Comparative Analysis. PAU Excellencia Global Academy Foundation, Philippines
John, W. O. (2011). The Right of Revolution: An Analysis of John Locke and Thomas Hobbes’ Social Contract Theories. Boston College. USA
Laskar, Manzoor, Summary of Social Contract Theory by Hobbes, Locke and Rousseau (April 4, 2013). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2410525 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2410525
Locke, J., 1632-1704. (1948). The second treatise of civil government and A letter concerning toleration. Oxford: B. Blackwell
Locke, J., & Wootton, D. (2003). Locke: Political Writings. Hackett Publishing. DOI:10.1017/cbo9780511696879
Mohamed, E. & Mahmoud, A. (2024). Pragmatism as a research paradigm. Proceedings of the 21st Conference on Research Methodology for Business and Management Studies ECRM
Paul, G. & Aaron, B. W. (2018). Pragmatism and Idealism. European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/
Rakhimova, M. I. (2024). Philosophy and its role in society. American Journal of Interdisciplinary Research Vol. 25
Townshend (Palgrave Macmillan, Houndmills) A very helpful overview of key interpretative debates about Hobbes in the twentieth century.
William, D. N. (2018). Rediscovering pragmatism and the policy sciences. European Policy Analysis. Vol. 4. Issue 1. P.13-22
Yuniar, M. (2022). The Concept of the State of Nature on Human Morals from the Viewpoint of State Life. International Journal of Humanities Education and Social Sciences (IJHESS). Volume 1, No 5, pgs 572 - 579

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2026 Author
